Microsoft must be so poor that they can't afford to hire security experts to fix Windows. How many years have they been trying to secure their OS? Too many, that's how many. Are they even trying anymore?
You clearly have no clue as to how expensive writing a new Operating System would be. Hell, just look back at when Apple needed to replace Mac OS and had to endure bringing back that smug turtle neck wearing megalomaniac bastard as CEO just to get an OS that wasn't some Open Source cheeseball
by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Friday June 29, 2018 @03:02AM (#56863810)
Sorry to have to tell you this, but when Apple needed a new operating system, they DID use cheeseball, open source software as itâ(TM)s base. See, macOS, as it is now called, (previously OS X,) is based on, and built atop one of the descendants of BSD-UNIX, itself a descendant of the original Bell Labs, AT&T UNIX, (NetBSD, I think, or maybe Open-,) and that is definitely open source. All the code underpinning macOS is UNIX, is open source, and that is the source of its power, stability, and security. Cheeseball indeed. Or... were you joking, and I missed it?
Poor Microsoft (Score:0)
Microsoft must be so poor that they can't afford to hire security experts to fix Windows. How many years have they been trying to secure their OS? Too many, that's how many. Are they even trying anymore?
Re: (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Poor Microsoft (Score:0)
Sorry to have to tell you this, but when Apple needed a new operating system, they DID use cheeseball, open source software as itâ(TM)s base. See, macOS, as it is now called, (previously OS X,) is based on, and built atop one of the descendants of BSD-UNIX, itself a descendant of the original Bell Labs, AT&T UNIX, (NetBSD, I think, or maybe Open-,) and that is definitely open source. All the code underpinning macOS is UNIX, is open source, and that is the source of its power, stability, and security. Cheeseball indeed. Or... were you joking, and I missed it?