Microsoft must be so poor that they can't afford to hire security experts to fix Windows. How many years have they been trying to secure their OS? Too many, that's how many. Are they even trying anymore?
You clearly have no clue as to how expensive writing a new Operating System would be. Hell, just look back at when Apple needed to replace Mac OS and had to endure bringing back that smug turtle neck wearing megalomaniac bastard as CEO just to get an OS that wasn't some Open Source cheeseball
Assuming that you really want to know, since I use Linux, Mac, Open and Free BSD I think I can answer objectively: Both OpenBSD and FreeBSD are reasonably easy to download and install and run on pretty much anything. At least, I have not found a server/desktop/laptop computer that it would not run on.
Theo De Raadt has a 'cut the crap' mentality so OpenBSD is simpler, with a smaller repository of programs. However, you can install FreeBSD software on OpenBSD. After a few days of use, you will know how.
Poor Microsoft (Score:0)
Microsoft must be so poor that they can't afford to hire security experts to fix Windows. How many years have they been trying to secure their OS? Too many, that's how many. Are they even trying anymore?
Re: (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:0)
OS X is built on FreeBSD. Just sayin'.
Re:Poor Microsoft (Score:2)
Which one is a better alternative to macOS? OpenBSD or FreeBSD?
Re: (Score:1)
Assuming that you really want to know, since I use Linux, Mac, Open and Free BSD I think I can answer objectively:
Both OpenBSD and FreeBSD are reasonably easy to download and install and run on pretty much anything. At least, I have not found a server/desktop/laptop computer that it would not run on.
Theo De Raadt has a 'cut the crap' mentality so OpenBSD is simpler, with a smaller repository of programs. However, you can install FreeBSD software on OpenBSD. After a few days of use, you will know how.
In g
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you for the comparison.